Intent(k) receives eligible census data from Eligibility(k). Open Eligibility(k), run eligibility, then click "Intent(k)" to send data here.
What's the primary goal for this plan?
Pick the single most important objective. Each goal leads to 2–3 specific plan designs optimized for that objective.
Choose a design approach
Add a Comparison Design
Show the sponsor what alternatives look like alongside your recommendation. Pick a different goal to compare against.
Choose a design approach
Review & Send to Design(k) Pro
Review your selected designs below. Set an optional budget, then send everything to Design(k) Pro for modeling.
$
Optional. If set, Design(k) Pro's engine will constrain profit sharing to stay within this budget. Safe Harbor costs are mandatory and never reduced by budget.
AI Analyzing Configuration…
Reviewing your plan designs for consistency and optimization.
Data Received from Eligibility(k)
📊 2026 IRS Contribution Limits
Master the IRS contribution limits to help clients maximize their retirement savings. Here's what you need to know for 2025 and 2026.
Key 401(k) Limits
401(k)/403(b)/457 Elective Deferrals
2025:$23,500
2026:$24,500
Age 50+ Catch-Up
2025:$7,500
2026:$8,000
🔥 Ages 60–63 Super Catch-Up (SECURE 2.0)
2025:$11,250
2026:$11,250
Annual Additions Limit §415(c)
2025:$70,000
2026:$72,000
Compensation & Testing Thresholds
§401(a)(17) Comp Cap
2025:$350,000
2026:$360,000
HCE Threshold §414(q)
2025:$160,000
2026:$160,000
Key Employee / Officer
2025:$230,000
2026:$235,000
Social Security Wage Base
2025:$176,100
2026:$184,500
What This Means
In 2026, employees under 50 can defer up to $24,500 in pre-tax or Roth contributions. Those 50+ can add $8,000 in catch-up contributions for a total of $32,500. The 402(g) limit applies across all plans — an employee with two 401(k)s shares one limit.
Starting in 2025, participants turning 60, 61, 62, or 63 during the plan year can make an enhanced catch-up of $11,250 instead of the standard $7,500/$8,000. This replaces (does not stack with) the regular catch-up. Designed to help near-retirees accelerate savings. SECURE 2.0 also requires catch-up contributions for HCEs earning $145K+ to be made as Roth.
The §415(c) limit of $72,000 (2026) is the total annual additions per participant: employee deferrals + employer match + employer profit sharing + forfeitures. Catch-up contributions are excluded from this limit. For an owner wanting maximum tax deferral: $24,500 deferral + $8,000 catch-up + employer PS up to the 415 ceiling.
The §401(a)(17) cap of $360,000 (2026) limits the compensation used for contribution calculations. An owner earning $500K can only have contributions calculated on $360K. This cap applies per-employer and affects match calculations, profit sharing allocations, and nondiscrimination testing.
Employees earning ≥$160,000 in the prior year (or >5% owners) are HCEs for nondiscrimination testing. The $160K threshold is unchanged for 2025→2026 testing. Without safe harbor, HCE deferrals are limited by the ADP test results — if NHCEs defer at low rates, HCEs may be forced to reduce their contributions or receive refunds.
💡
Tip: Intent(k) automatically applies the correct IRS limits for the selected plan year. The §401(a)(17) compensation cap is applied when calculating match and profit sharing costs. Design(k) Pro will model the full 415(c) annual additions limit per participant.
🏗️ 401(k) Plan Type Comparison
Not all retirement plans are created equal. The right plan depends on business size, owner goals, and how much you want going to employees vs. owners.
Common Plan Types
Starter Plan
Traditional 401(k)
Best for: Companies wanting maximum flexibility in plan design and employer contribution levels.
Employee Deferral (2026)$24,500
Catch-up (50+)$8,000
Employer ContributionsDiscretionary
✓ Full flexibility✓ Roth option✗ Requires ADP/ACP testing
Most Popular
Safe Harbor 401(k)
Best for: Businesses wanting to maximize owner savings with predictable employee cost. Bypasses ADP/ACP testing.
Employee Deferral (2026)$24,500
Catch-up (50+)$8,000
Total Annual Additions$72,000
✓ No ADP/ACP testing✓ Profit sharing flexibility✓ Roth & loan options✗ 3–4% required to employees
Age-Weighted
401(k) Cross-Tested
Best for: Older owners with younger employees — maximize owner allocation through age-weighted profit sharing.
Based on a typical scenario: 55-year-old owner earning $250K with 4 younger employees averaging $55K each.
Traditional
Safe Harbor
Cross-Tested
401(k) + Cash Bal.
💡
How Intent(k) uses this: Your goal and sub-option selection determines which plan type applies. A Safe Harbor match + cross-tested profit sharing creates the "Owner Maximizer" design. Design(k) Pro will model exact costs and contribution allocations based on your census data. Each sub-option in the goal selection maps to a specific plan type and configuration.
📖Help Center
Welcome to Intent(k)
Pick your plan sponsor's primary goal, choose a design approach, optionally add comparison designs, then send everything to Design(k) Pro for modeling.
🎯
Pick Goal & Design
→
⚖️
Add Comparison
→
🚀
Review & Send
🎯
Goal-Driven Design
Pick one of 5 plan goals — each leads to 2–3 specific plan designs with match, PS, and vesting pre-configured.
⚖️
Multi-Scenario Comparison
Add up to 2 alternative designs alongside your recommendation. Design(k) Pro models all scenarios side-by-side.
🛡️
Safe Harbor Built In
Every sub-option includes Safe Harbor — it's baked into the design, not a separate choice. Match, NE, and QACA variants available.
🔄
Iterative Loop
If Design(k) Pro shows costs over budget, return here to pick a different design approach and re-send.
Employer Contribution Types Explained
Safe harbor designs eliminate ADP/ACP nondiscrimination testing. Each type has different cost profiles and vesting requirements.
Safe Harbor Basic
100% of first 3% + 50% of next 2%
Max employer cost: 4% of comp
Employee must defer to receive match. Most common safe harbor design.
ADP/ACP ExemptImmediate vesting
Safe Harbor Enhanced
100% of first 4%+
Max employer cost: 4%+ of comp
Dollar-for-dollar match encourages higher deferral rates. More generous than basic.
ADP/ACP ExemptImmediate vesting
Safe Harbor Non-Elective
3% of comp to all eligible
Max employer cost: 3% of comp
Every eligible employee gets 3% regardless of whether they defer. No employee action required.
ADP/ACP ExemptImmediate vesting
QACA Safe Harbor
100% of first 1% + 50% of next 5%
Max employer cost: 3.5% of comp
Paired with auto-enrollment. Allows 2-year cliff vesting instead of immediate.
ADP/ACP Exempt2-year cliff OK
Custom Formula
Define your own tiers
Max employer cost: Varies by formula
For plans needing non-standard match structures. Does not automatically satisfy safe harbor — must pass ADP/ACP testing.
Requires ADP/ACP
Quick Comparison
Type
Max Cost
Requires Deferral?
Vesting
Best For
Basic Match
4%
Yes
Immediate
Most common SH design
Enhanced Match
4%+
Yes
Immediate
Encouraging higher deferrals
Non-Elective
3%
No
Immediate
Universal benefit, late SH adoption
QACA
3.5%
Yes
2-yr cliff
Auto-enrollment + delayed vesting
Custom
Varies
Depends
Any schedule
Non-standard designs
When to Use Each
Basic Match Default choice — balances cost with employee incentive to defer.
Enhanced When you want employees to defer at least 4% and can afford the extra cost.
Non-Elective When adopting safe harbor mid-year or when sponsor wants universal benefit.
QACA When pairing with auto-enrollment and sponsor wants 2-year cliff vesting on match.
Custom When no safe harbor type fits — plan will need ADP/ACP testing.
Profit Sharing Allocation Methods
Profit sharing is a separate employer contribution independent of employee deferrals. The allocation method determines how contributions are divided among participants.
Pro-Rata
Proportional allocation
Same percentage of compensation for every eligible participant. Simple and easy to administer. If the employer contributes 5%, everyone gets 5% of their compensation.
Best for: Equal treatment, simple administration
Integrated
Permitted Disparity / Social Security integration
Higher contribution rate on compensation above the Social Security wage base ($176,100 for 2025). Accounts for Social Security benefits already covering lower-paid employees.
Best for: Favoring higher-paid employees within IRS limits
Cross-Tested
New Comparability / age-weighted
Different contribution rates for different groups (e.g., owners vs. staff). Tested by converting contributions to equivalent benefits. Must pass Gateway Minimum (typically 5% for NHCEs).
Best for: Maximizing owner benefits, older owners with younger staff
Discretionary
Annual determination
Employer decides the amount each year with no fixed commitment. Provides maximum flexibility to match business conditions. Can use any allocation method when a contribution is made.
Best for: Variable cash flow, no ongoing commitment
Quick Comparison
Method
Complexity
Favors Owners?
Testing
Annual Commitment
Pro-Rata
Low
Neutral
General test
As elected
Integrated
Medium
Somewhat
Permitted disparity
As elected
Cross-Tested
High
Significantly
EBAR / Gateway
Must pass testing
Discretionary
Low
Depends
Per method used
None
When Cross-Testing Makes Sense
Cross-tested plans work best when older owners/partners want to maximize their contributions while minimizing cost for younger rank-and-file employees. The age difference allows higher owner contributions to pass the equivalent benefit test. If owner and staff ages are similar, cross-testing provides less advantage.
Glossary
Safe Harbor
Plan design that automatically satisfies ADP/ACP nondiscrimination testing through required employer contributions (match or non-elective).
QACA
Qualified Automatic Contribution Arrangement. Combines auto-enrollment with safe harbor match. Permits 2-year cliff vesting instead of immediate.
ADP/ACP Test
Nondiscrimination tests comparing HCE vs NHCE deferral rates (ADP) and matching contribution rates (ACP). Safe harbor designs bypass these tests.
Permitted Disparity
IRS-approved method allowing higher contributions on compensation above the Social Security wage base, accounting for SS benefits.
Cross-Tested (New Comparability)
Profit sharing method that tests contributions by converting to equivalent benefits. Allows different rates by classification if tests pass.
Pro-Rata
Allocation method giving each participant the same percentage of compensation. Simplest profit sharing approach.
Gateway Minimum
Minimum allocation required for NHCEs in cross-tested plans. Generally 5% of compensation or one-third of the highest HCE rate.
Match Formula
The rate at which employer matching contributions are calculated based on employee deferrals. Expressed as "X% of first Y% of comp."
Profit Sharing
Discretionary employer contributions allocated to participants. Not contingent on actual profits. Separate from matching contributions.
Vesting Schedule
Timeline for participant ownership of employer contributions. Common: immediate, 3-year cliff, 6-year graded. Safe harbor requires immediate vesting (except QACA).
HCE / NHCE
Highly Compensated Employee: >5% owner or prior year comp ≥ $160,000 (2025). NHCE is any participant who is not an HCE.
Top-Heavy Plan
Plan where >60% of account balances belong to key employees. Requires minimum 3% contribution for non-key employees.
Annual Additions (415(c))
Maximum total contributions (employee + employer) per participant. $70,000 for 2025, or 100% of comp if less.
Compensation Limit (401(a)(17))
Maximum compensation considered for plan purposes: $350,000 for 2025. Contributions cannot be calculated on amounts above this cap.
QNEC
Qualified Non-Elective Contribution. Employer contribution that is immediately 100% vested. Can be used to correct ADP/ACP testing failures.
EACA
Eligible Automatic Contribution Arrangement. Auto-enrollment feature allowing employees a 90-day withdrawal window. Not the same as QACA.
Frequently Asked Questions
A safe harbor match requires employee deferrals to trigger the employer contribution — employees who don't defer get nothing. A non-elective contribution gives 3% of compensation to every eligible employee regardless of whether they defer. Non-elective is simpler (no tracking of deferral rates) but costs the same for non-deferring employees. Match designs cost less if some employees don't defer.
Yes — this is very common. The employer match and profit sharing are separate contribution sources. For example, you might offer a safe harbor basic match (4% max) plus a cross-tested profit sharing contribution. Both are included in the annual budget. The 415(c) annual additions limit ($70,000 for 2025) applies to the total of all employer and employee contributions combined.
The budget you set here is the total annual employer cost target — combining match and profit sharing. Design(k) Pro will model the actual contributions per employee and show you the total cost. If it exceeds your budget, come back to Intent(k), adjust your match formula, profit sharing method, or budget amount, and re-send. This iterative loop helps you find the right balance between plan generosity and cost.
You can always come back to Intent(k), change your settings, and re-send. Design(k) Pro will pick up the new configuration. The pipeline is designed for iteration — most plan designs require 2-3 passes to balance goals, contributions, and budget.
No. Safe harbor is optional. Without it, the plan must pass ADP/ACP nondiscrimination testing each year. If the plan fails, HCE deferrals or contributions must be refunded or corrected. Safe harbor eliminates this risk but requires a minimum employer contribution. Use the Custom Formula option if you want a non-safe-harbor match — just know that ADP/ACP testing will apply.
Cross-testing (New Comparability) converts profit sharing contributions into equivalent benefits using age-based actuarial factors. Because older participants have fewer years to retirement, a given dollar amount converts to a larger equivalent benefit. This allows older owners to receive much higher contribution rates than younger staff while still passing IRS tests. It works best when there's a significant age gap between owners and employees. If ages are similar, the advantage shrinks.
The pipeline flows: Census(k) Pro (validate census) → Eligibility(k) (determine who's eligible) → Intent(k) (configure goals, match, PS, budget) → Design(k) Pro (model the plan and test compliance). Intent(k) receives eligible employees from Eligibility(k) via a secure data transfer, and sends the configuration forward to Design(k) Pro.
All census data processing happens locally in your browser. The only external call is the AI Configuration Review, which sends only your plan design choices (goals, match type, budget) and aggregate employee count — no names, SSNs, dates of birth, or compensation figures are ever transmitted. Click the Security button in the nav bar for full details.
What's New
v2.0April 2026
Goal-Driven Multi-Scenario Design: 5 plan goals with 14 pre-built sub-options replace the manual 6-step configuration. Pick a goal → choose a design approach → match, PS, vesting, and auto-enrollment are set automatically
Comparison Designs: Add up to 2 alternative designs alongside your recommended design. Design(k) Pro runs the engine for each and shows side-by-side results
Safe Harbor Baked In: SH Compliance removed as a standalone goal — every sub-option includes Safe Harbor as a mechanism. Match, Non-Elective, and QACA variants across all goals
Scenario Review Table: Side-by-side comparison of all selected designs with goal labels, match types, PS types, vesting schedules before sending to Design(k) Pro
V1 Backward Compatible: Sends both the new scenarios array and a V1-compatible intentConfig at top level. Existing Design(k) Pro works unchanged until multi-scenario receiver is deployed
Demo Mode: Add ?demo=1 to the URL to test the full flow without Eligibility(k) pipeline data
v1.5March 2026
✓Configuration Templates: 10 pre-built plan designs with one-click loading — from Startup Standard to Owner Maximizer
✓Rich Template Modal: Visual comparison cards with tags, line items, pro/con pills, and "Percent to Owner" bar chart
✓NOX DNA Helix Spinner: Beautiful undulating strand animation replaces generic spinner during AI Configuration Review
✓IRS Limits Modal Redesign: Campaign(k)-style 2×2 limit cards with 2025/2026 values, section headers, and "What This Means" expandable accordion
✓Plan Types Modal Redesign: Rich plan comparison cards with line-item details, pro/con pills, and "Percent to Owner" gradient bar chart
✓Visual Enhancements: Staggered fade-in on goal cards, smooth slide transitions between steps
v1.4March 2026
✓Match Cost Estimator: Live cost estimate on Step 2 based on census data and selected match formula — updates instantly on type/tier changes