Intent(k) receives eligible census data from Eligibility(k). Open Eligibility(k), run eligibility, then click "Intent(k)" to send data here.
Step 1: Plan Goals
What does the plan sponsor want to achieve? Select all that apply, or add a custom goal.
👑
Maximize Owner Benefits
Highest possible contributions and tax-deferred savings for the business owner(s).
💰
Minimize Employer Cost
Keep total employer contributions as low as possible while maintaining compliance.
🧲
Attract & Retain Talent
Competitive benefits package to recruit and keep quality employees.
🛡️
Safe Harbor Compliance
Avoid ADP/ACP nondiscrimination testing with a safe harbor design.
📊
Tax-Deferred Savings for All
Provide meaningful retirement savings opportunity for all eligible employees.
⚡
Simple Administration
Minimize complexity and ongoing administrative burden.
Step 2: Employer Match
Will the employer provide a matching contribution? If yes, select the match type.
Employer Match
Employer contributes based on employee deferrals
Select a match type:
Define match tiers:
% match on first% of comp
% match on next% of comp
Up to 5 tiers supported.
📊Estimated Annual Match Cost
—per year (maximum)
Assumes all employees defer enough to receive the full match. Compensation capped at the 401(a)(17) limit.
Step 3: Profit Sharing
Will the employer make profit sharing contributions? This is separate from matching.
Profit Sharing
Discretionary employer contributions allocated to participants
Select allocation method:
📊Profit Sharing Cost Preview
Based on eligible employee compensation. Actual amounts determined by Design(k) Pro modeling.
Step 4: Vesting & Auto-Enrollment
Configure vesting schedules for employer contributions and set up automatic enrollment if desired.
Vesting Schedules
Vesting determines how quickly employees own employer contributions. Employee deferrals are always 100% vested immediately.
Employer Match Vesting
Profit Sharing Vesting
Vesting Schedule Preview
Years of Service
Match Vested %
PS Vested %
Automatic Enrollment
Automatically enroll eligible employees at a default deferral rate. Employees can opt out or change their rate.
Auto-Enrollment
Automatically enroll employees at a default deferral rate
QACA match requires auto-enrollment. This is pre-enabled.
Arrangement Type
%
Typical: 3-6% of compensation
% / year
Increases deferral annually
%
Maximum auto-escalated rate
days
30-90 days; refund if opted out
Step 5: Employer Budget
Set an annual employer budget. Design(k) Pro will use this to model contributions that fit within this constraint.
$0
Estimated Match Cost
$0
Total Eligible Compensation
0
Eligible Employees
Total employer cost (match + PS)
Match
$0
Remaining (PS)
$0
How budget works with Design(k) Pro:
Design(k) Pro will model employer contributions and show you the total cost. If it exceeds your budget, you can come back here, adjust your match/PS settings, and re-send. This iterative loop helps you find the right plan design.
Step 6: Review & Send to Design(k) Pro
Review your configuration below. The AI will provide an overview, then you can send everything to Design(k) Pro.
AI Analyzing Configuration…
Reviewing your plan goals, match settings, and budget for consistency.
Data Received from Eligibility(k)
🎨 Plan Configuration Templates
Select a pre-built configuration to auto-fill your plan settings. Click any card to apply it — you can customize after loading.
Common Configurations
Starter Plan
Startup Standard
Best for: New businesses wanting a simple, compliant plan with minimal employer cost.
MatchSH Basic (4% max)
Profit SharingNone
Budget$25,000
VestingImmediate
✓ No ADP/ACP testing✓ Low admin burden✗ Limited owner benefits
Most Popular
Safe Harbor Essential
Best for: Businesses wanting testing-free compliance with a balanced employer contribution.
MatchSH Basic (4% max)
Profit SharingPro-Rata
Budget$50,000
VestingMatch: Immed / PS: 3yr cliff
✓ No ADP/ACP testing✓ PS flexibility◆ Moderate cost
Budget Friendly
Cost Conscious
Best for: Businesses that need safe harbor but want the lowest possible employer cost.
MatchSH Non-Elective (3%)
Profit SharingNone
Budget$15,000
VestingImmediate
✓ Lowest SH cost✓ No deferral required✗ All employees get 3%
Competitive
Talent Magnet
Best for: Companies in competitive markets wanting generous benefits to attract and retain top talent.
MatchSH Enhanced (4%+)
Profit SharingPro-Rata 5%
Budget$150,000
Auto-EnrollEACA @ 6%
✓ Top-tier benefits✓ High participation✗ Higher employer cost
Owner-Focused Designs
Owner Max
Owner Maximizer
Best for: Older owners with younger staff wanting maximum tax-deferred savings through cross-tested PS.
Best for: Growing tech companies wanting competitive benefits with auto-enrollment and escalation to build savings culture.
MatchSH Enhanced (4%+)
Profit SharingDiscretionary
Auto-EnrollEACA @ 3%, +1%/yr to 10%
Budget$75,000
✓ Flexible PS commitment✓ Builds deferral culture◆ PS optional each year
Quick Comparison: Percent to Owner
Based on a typical scenario: 55-year-old owner earning $300K with 4 younger employees averaging $55K each.
Cost Conscious
Startup Standard
SH Essential
Talent Magnet
Partnership
Professional Practice
Owner Maximizer
Solo Consultant
💡 How Templates Work in Intent(k)
Clicking a template auto-fills your Goals, Match, Profit Sharing, Vesting, Auto-Enrollment, and Budget settings. You can then customize any setting before sending to Design(k) Pro. Templates are starting points — adjust them to fit your client's specific situation. The cost estimators on Steps 2-3 and budget guardrails on Step 5 will recalculate instantly with the loaded template values.
📊 2026 IRS Contribution Limits
Master the IRS contribution limits to help clients maximize their retirement savings. Here's what you need to know for 2025 and 2026.
Key 401(k) Limits
401(k)/403(b)/457 Elective Deferrals
2025:$23,500
2026:$24,500
Age 50+ Catch-Up
2025:$7,500
2026:$8,000
🔥 Ages 60–63 Super Catch-Up (SECURE 2.0)
2025:$11,250
2026:$11,250
Annual Additions Limit §415(c)
2025:$70,000
2026:$72,000
Compensation & Testing Thresholds
§401(a)(17) Comp Cap
2025:$350,000
2026:$360,000
HCE Threshold §414(q)
2025:$160,000
2026:$160,000
Key Employee / Officer
2025:$230,000
2026:$235,000
Social Security Wage Base
2025:$176,100
2026:$184,500
What This Means
In 2026, employees under 50 can defer up to $24,500 in pre-tax or Roth contributions. Those 50+ can add $8,000 in catch-up contributions for a total of $32,500. The 402(g) limit applies across all plans — an employee with two 401(k)s shares one limit.
Starting in 2025, participants turning 60, 61, 62, or 63 during the plan year can make an enhanced catch-up of $11,250 instead of the standard $7,500/$8,000. This replaces (does not stack with) the regular catch-up. Designed to help near-retirees accelerate savings. SECURE 2.0 also requires catch-up contributions for HCEs earning $145K+ to be made as Roth.
The §415(c) limit of $72,000 (2026) is the total annual additions per participant: employee deferrals + employer match + employer profit sharing + forfeitures. Catch-up contributions are excluded from this limit. For an owner wanting maximum tax deferral: $24,500 deferral + $8,000 catch-up + employer PS up to the 415 ceiling.
The §401(a)(17) cap of $360,000 (2026) limits the compensation used for contribution calculations. An owner earning $500K can only have contributions calculated on $360K. This cap applies per-employer and affects match calculations, profit sharing allocations, and nondiscrimination testing.
Employees earning ≥$160,000 in the prior year (or >5% owners) are HCEs for nondiscrimination testing. The $160K threshold is unchanged for 2025→2026 testing. Without safe harbor, HCE deferrals are limited by the ADP test results — if NHCEs defer at low rates, HCEs may be forced to reduce their contributions or receive refunds.
💡
Tip: Intent(k) automatically applies the correct IRS limits for the selected plan year. The cost estimators on Steps 2-3 use the §401(a)(17) compensation cap when calculating match and profit sharing costs. Design(k) Pro will model the full 415(c) annual additions limit per participant.
🏗️ 401(k) Plan Type Comparison
Not all retirement plans are created equal. The right plan depends on business size, owner goals, and how much you want going to employees vs. owners.
Common Plan Types
Starter Plan
Traditional 401(k)
Best for: Companies wanting maximum flexibility in plan design and employer contribution levels.
Employee Deferral (2026)$24,500
Catch-up (50+)$8,000
Employer MatchDiscretionary
✓ Full flexibility✓ Roth option✗ Requires ADP/ACP testing
Most Popular
Safe Harbor 401(k)
Best for: Businesses wanting to maximize owner savings with predictable employee cost. Bypasses ADP/ACP testing.
Employee Deferral (2026)$24,500
Catch-up (50+)$8,000
Total Annual Additions$72,000
✓ No ADP/ACP testing✓ Profit sharing flexibility✓ Roth & loan options✗ 3–4% required to employees
Age-Weighted
401(k) Cross-Tested
Best for: Older owners with younger employees — maximize owner allocation through age-weighted profit sharing.
Based on a typical scenario: 55-year-old owner earning $250K with 4 younger employees averaging $55K each.
Traditional
Safe Harbor
Cross-Tested
401(k) + Cash Bal.
💡
How Intent(k) uses this: Your selections in Steps 2-3 determine which plan type applies. A Safe Harbor match + cross-tested profit sharing creates the "Owner Maximizer" design. Design(k) Pro will model exact costs and contribution allocations based on your census data. Use the Templates sidebar card to quickly load a pre-built configuration for any of these plan types.
📖Help Center
Welcome to Intent(k)
Configure your plan sponsor's goals, employer match, profit sharing, vesting, auto-enrollment, and budget — then send everything to Design(k) Pro for modeling.
🎯
Goals
→
🤝
Match
→
📊
Profit Sharing
→
⏱️
Vesting
→
💰
Budget
→
🚀
Send
🎯
Goal-Driven Design
Select plan goals (maximize owner benefits, safe harbor, minimize cost, etc.) that guide Design(k) Pro's modeling.
🛡️
Safe Harbor Options
Choose from Basic, Enhanced, Non-Elective, QACA, or define a custom match formula with editable tiers.
🤖
AI Configuration Review
AI analyzes your selections for conflicts, tensions, and consistency before you send to Design(k) Pro.
🔄
Iterative Loop
If Design(k) Pro shows costs over budget, return here to adjust settings and re-send. Fine-tune until it fits.
Employer Match Types Explained
Safe harbor designs eliminate ADP/ACP nondiscrimination testing. Each type has different cost profiles and vesting requirements.
Safe Harbor Basic
100% of first 3% + 50% of next 2%
Max employer cost: 4% of comp
Employee must defer to receive match. Most common safe harbor design.
ADP/ACP ExemptImmediate vesting
Safe Harbor Enhanced
100% of first 4%+
Max employer cost: 4%+ of comp
Dollar-for-dollar match encourages higher deferral rates. More generous than basic.
ADP/ACP ExemptImmediate vesting
Safe Harbor Non-Elective
3% of comp to all eligible
Max employer cost: 3% of comp
Every eligible employee gets 3% regardless of whether they defer. No employee action required.
ADP/ACP ExemptImmediate vesting
QACA Safe Harbor
100% of first 1% + 50% of next 5%
Max employer cost: 3.5% of comp
Paired with auto-enrollment. Allows 2-year cliff vesting instead of immediate.
ADP/ACP Exempt2-year cliff OK
Custom Formula
Define your own tiers
Max employer cost: Varies by formula
For plans needing non-standard match structures. Does not automatically satisfy safe harbor — must pass ADP/ACP testing.
Requires ADP/ACP
Quick Comparison
Type
Max Cost
Requires Deferral?
Vesting
Best For
Basic Match
4%
Yes
Immediate
Most common SH design
Enhanced Match
4%+
Yes
Immediate
Encouraging higher deferrals
Non-Elective
3%
No
Immediate
Universal benefit, late SH adoption
QACA
3.5%
Yes
2-yr cliff
Auto-enrollment + delayed vesting
Custom
Varies
Depends
Any schedule
Non-standard designs
When to Use Each
Basic Match Default choice — balances cost with employee incentive to defer.
Enhanced When you want employees to defer at least 4% and can afford the extra cost.
Non-Elective When adopting safe harbor mid-year or when sponsor wants universal benefit.
QACA When pairing with auto-enrollment and sponsor wants 2-year cliff vesting on match.
Custom When no safe harbor type fits — plan will need ADP/ACP testing.
Profit Sharing Allocation Methods
Profit sharing is a separate employer contribution independent of employee deferrals. The allocation method determines how contributions are divided among participants.
Pro-Rata
Proportional allocation
Same percentage of compensation for every eligible participant. Simple and easy to administer. If the employer contributes 5%, everyone gets 5% of their compensation.
Best for: Equal treatment, simple administration
Integrated
Permitted Disparity / Social Security integration
Higher contribution rate on compensation above the Social Security wage base ($176,100 for 2025). Accounts for Social Security benefits already covering lower-paid employees.
Best for: Favoring higher-paid employees within IRS limits
Cross-Tested
New Comparability / age-weighted
Different contribution rates for different groups (e.g., owners vs. staff). Tested by converting contributions to equivalent benefits. Must pass Gateway Minimum (typically 5% for NHCEs).
Best for: Maximizing owner benefits, older owners with younger staff
Discretionary
Annual determination
Employer decides the amount each year with no fixed commitment. Provides maximum flexibility to match business conditions. Can use any allocation method when a contribution is made.
Best for: Variable cash flow, no ongoing commitment
Quick Comparison
Method
Complexity
Favors Owners?
Testing
Annual Commitment
Pro-Rata
Low
Neutral
General test
As elected
Integrated
Medium
Somewhat
Permitted disparity
As elected
Cross-Tested
High
Significantly
EBAR / Gateway
Must pass testing
Discretionary
Low
Depends
Per method used
None
When Cross-Testing Makes Sense
Cross-tested plans work best when older owners/partners want to maximize their contributions while minimizing cost for younger rank-and-file employees. The age difference allows higher owner contributions to pass the equivalent benefit test. If owner and staff ages are similar, cross-testing provides less advantage.
Glossary
Safe Harbor
Plan design that automatically satisfies ADP/ACP nondiscrimination testing through required employer contributions (match or non-elective).
QACA
Qualified Automatic Contribution Arrangement. Combines auto-enrollment with safe harbor match. Permits 2-year cliff vesting instead of immediate.
ADP/ACP Test
Nondiscrimination tests comparing HCE vs NHCE deferral rates (ADP) and matching contribution rates (ACP). Safe harbor designs bypass these tests.
Permitted Disparity
IRS-approved method allowing higher contributions on compensation above the Social Security wage base, accounting for SS benefits.
Cross-Tested (New Comparability)
Profit sharing method that tests contributions by converting to equivalent benefits. Allows different rates by classification if tests pass.
Pro-Rata
Allocation method giving each participant the same percentage of compensation. Simplest profit sharing approach.
Gateway Minimum
Minimum allocation required for NHCEs in cross-tested plans. Generally 5% of compensation or one-third of the highest HCE rate.
Match Formula
The rate at which employer matching contributions are calculated based on employee deferrals. Expressed as "X% of first Y% of comp."
Profit Sharing
Discretionary employer contributions allocated to participants. Not contingent on actual profits. Separate from matching contributions.
Vesting Schedule
Timeline for participant ownership of employer contributions. Common: immediate, 3-year cliff, 6-year graded. Safe harbor requires immediate vesting (except QACA).
HCE / NHCE
Highly Compensated Employee: >5% owner or prior year comp ≥ $160,000 (2025). NHCE is any participant who is not an HCE.
Top-Heavy Plan
Plan where >60% of account balances belong to key employees. Requires minimum 3% contribution for non-key employees.
Annual Additions (415(c))
Maximum total contributions (employee + employer) per participant. $70,000 for 2025, or 100% of comp if less.
Compensation Limit (401(a)(17))
Maximum compensation considered for plan purposes: $350,000 for 2025. Contributions cannot be calculated on amounts above this cap.
QNEC
Qualified Non-Elective Contribution. Employer contribution that is immediately 100% vested. Can be used to correct ADP/ACP testing failures.
EACA
Eligible Automatic Contribution Arrangement. Auto-enrollment feature allowing employees a 90-day withdrawal window. Not the same as QACA.
Frequently Asked Questions
A safe harbor match requires employee deferrals to trigger the employer contribution — employees who don't defer get nothing. A non-elective contribution gives 3% of compensation to every eligible employee regardless of whether they defer. Non-elective is simpler (no tracking of deferral rates) but costs the same for non-deferring employees. Match designs cost less if some employees don't defer.
Yes — this is very common. The employer match and profit sharing are separate contribution sources. For example, you might offer a safe harbor basic match (4% max) plus a cross-tested profit sharing contribution. Both are included in the annual budget. The 415(c) annual additions limit ($70,000 for 2025) applies to the total of all employer and employee contributions combined.
The budget you set here is the total annual employer cost target — combining match and profit sharing. Design(k) Pro will model the actual contributions per employee and show you the total cost. If it exceeds your budget, come back to Intent(k), adjust your match formula, profit sharing method, or budget amount, and re-send. This iterative loop helps you find the right balance between plan generosity and cost.
You can always come back to Intent(k), change your settings, and re-send. Design(k) Pro will pick up the new configuration. The pipeline is designed for iteration — most plan designs require 2-3 passes to balance goals, contributions, and budget.
No. Safe harbor is optional. Without it, the plan must pass ADP/ACP nondiscrimination testing each year. If the plan fails, HCE deferrals or contributions must be refunded or corrected. Safe harbor eliminates this risk but requires a minimum employer contribution. Use the Custom Formula option if you want a non-safe-harbor match — just know that ADP/ACP testing will apply.
Cross-testing (New Comparability) converts profit sharing contributions into equivalent benefits using age-based actuarial factors. Because older participants have fewer years to retirement, a given dollar amount converts to a larger equivalent benefit. This allows older owners to receive much higher contribution rates than younger staff while still passing IRS tests. It works best when there's a significant age gap between owners and employees. If ages are similar, the advantage shrinks.
The pipeline flows: Census(k) Pro (validate census) → Eligibility(k) (determine who's eligible) → Intent(k) (configure goals, match, PS, budget) → Design(k) Pro (model the plan and test compliance). Intent(k) receives eligible employees from Eligibility(k) via a secure data transfer, and sends the configuration forward to Design(k) Pro.
All census data processing happens locally in your browser. The only external call is the AI Configuration Review, which sends only your plan design choices (goals, match type, budget) and aggregate employee count — no names, SSNs, dates of birth, or compensation figures are ever transmitted. Click the Security button in the nav bar for full details.
What's New
v1.5March 2026
✓Configuration Templates: 10 pre-built plan designs with one-click loading — from Startup Standard to Owner Maximizer
✓Rich Template Modal: Visual comparison cards with tags, line items, pro/con pills, and "Percent to Owner" bar chart
✓NOX DNA Helix Spinner: Beautiful undulating strand animation replaces generic spinner during AI Configuration Review
✓IRS Limits Modal Redesign: Campaign(k)-style 2×2 limit cards with 2025/2026 values, section headers, and "What This Means" expandable accordion
✓Plan Types Modal Redesign: Rich plan comparison cards with line-item details, pro/con pills, and "Percent to Owner" gradient bar chart
✓Visual Enhancements: Staggered fade-in on goal cards, smooth slide transitions between steps
v1.4March 2026
✓Match Cost Estimator: Live cost estimate on Step 2 based on census data and selected match formula — updates instantly on type/tier changes