Intent(k) receives eligible census data from Eligibility(k). Open Eligibility(k), run eligibility, then click "Intent(k)" to send data here.
Step 1: Plan Goals
What does the plan sponsor want to achieve? Select all that apply, or add a custom goal.
π
Maximize Owner Benefits
Highest possible contributions and tax-deferred savings for the business owner(s).
π°
Minimize Employer Cost
Keep total employer contributions as low as possible while maintaining compliance.
π§²
Attract & Retain Talent
Competitive benefits package to recruit and keep quality employees.
π‘οΈ
Safe Harbor Compliance
Avoid ADP/ACP nondiscrimination testing with a safe harbor design.
π
Tax-Deferred Savings for All
Provide meaningful retirement savings opportunity for all eligible employees.
β‘
Simple Administration
Minimize complexity and ongoing administrative burden.
Step 2: Employer Match
Will the employer provide a matching contribution? If yes, select the match type.
Employer Match
Employer contributes based on employee deferrals
Select a match type:
Define match tiers:
% match on first% of comp
% match on next% of comp
Step 3: Profit Sharing
Will the employer make profit sharing contributions? This is separate from matching.
Profit Sharing
Discretionary employer contributions allocated to participants
Select allocation method:
Step 4: Employer Budget
Set an annual employer budget. Design(k) will use this to model contributions that fit within this constraint. You can iterate after seeing results.
Total employer cost (match + PS)
How budget works in Design(k):
Design(k) will model employer contributions and show you the total cost. If it exceeds your budget, you can come back here, adjust your match/PS settings, and re-send. This iterative loop helps you find the right plan design.
Step 5: Review & Send to Design(k)
Review your configuration below. The AI will provide an overview, then you can send everything to Design(k).
AI Analyzing Configurationβ¦
Reviewing your plan goals, match settings, and budget for consistency.
Data Received from Eligibility(k)
πHelp Center
Welcome to Intent(k)
Configure your plan sponsor's goals, employer match, profit sharing, and budget β then send everything to Design(k) for modeling.
π―
Goals
β
π€
Match
β
π
Profit Sharing
β
π°
Budget
β
π
Send
π―
Goal-Driven Design
Select plan goals (maximize owner benefits, safe harbor, minimize cost, etc.) that guide Design(k)'s modeling.
π‘οΈ
Safe Harbor Options
Choose from Basic, Enhanced, Non-Elective, QACA, or define a custom match formula with editable tiers.
π€
AI Configuration Review
AI analyzes your selections for conflicts, tensions, and consistency before you send to Design(k).
π
Iterative Loop
If Design(k) shows costs over budget, return here to adjust settings and re-send. Fine-tune until it fits.
Employer Match Types Explained
Safe harbor designs eliminate ADP/ACP nondiscrimination testing. Each type has different cost profiles and vesting requirements.
Safe Harbor Basic
100% of first 3% + 50% of next 2%
Max employer cost: 4% of comp
Employee must defer to receive match. Most common safe harbor design.
ADP/ACP ExemptImmediate vesting
Safe Harbor Enhanced
100% of first 4%+
Max employer cost: 4%+ of comp
Dollar-for-dollar match encourages higher deferral rates. More generous than basic.
ADP/ACP ExemptImmediate vesting
Safe Harbor Non-Elective
3% of comp to all eligible
Max employer cost: 3% of comp
Every eligible employee gets 3% regardless of whether they defer. No employee action required.
ADP/ACP ExemptImmediate vesting
QACA Safe Harbor
100% of first 1% + 50% of next 5%
Max employer cost: 3.5% of comp
Paired with auto-enrollment. Allows 2-year cliff vesting instead of immediate.
ADP/ACP Exempt2-year cliff OK
Custom Formula
Define your own tiers
Max employer cost: Varies by formula
For plans needing non-standard match structures. Does not automatically satisfy safe harbor β must pass ADP/ACP testing.
Requires ADP/ACP
Quick Comparison
Type
Max Cost
Requires Deferral?
Vesting
Best For
Basic Match
4%
Yes
Immediate
Most common SH design
Enhanced Match
4%+
Yes
Immediate
Encouraging higher deferrals
Non-Elective
3%
No
Immediate
Universal benefit, late SH adoption
QACA
3.5%
Yes
2-yr cliff
Auto-enrollment + delayed vesting
Custom
Varies
Depends
Any schedule
Non-standard designs
When to Use Each
Basic Match Default choice β balances cost with employee incentive to defer.
Enhanced When you want employees to defer at least 4% and can afford the extra cost.
Non-Elective When adopting safe harbor mid-year or when sponsor wants universal benefit.
QACA When pairing with auto-enrollment and sponsor wants 2-year cliff vesting on match.
Custom When no safe harbor type fits β plan will need ADP/ACP testing.
Profit Sharing Allocation Methods
Profit sharing is a separate employer contribution independent of employee deferrals. The allocation method determines how contributions are divided among participants.
Pro-Rata
Proportional allocation
Same percentage of compensation for every eligible participant. Simple and easy to administer. If the employer contributes 5%, everyone gets 5% of their compensation.
Best for: Equal treatment, simple administration
Integrated
Permitted Disparity / Social Security integration
Higher contribution rate on compensation above the Social Security wage base ($176,100 for 2025). Accounts for Social Security benefits already covering lower-paid employees.
Best for: Favoring higher-paid employees within IRS limits
Cross-Tested
New Comparability / age-weighted
Different contribution rates for different groups (e.g., owners vs. staff). Tested by converting contributions to equivalent benefits. Must pass Gateway Minimum (typically 5% for NHCEs).
Best for: Maximizing owner benefits, older owners with younger staff
Discretionary
Annual determination
Employer decides the amount each year with no fixed commitment. Provides maximum flexibility to match business conditions. Can use any allocation method when a contribution is made.
Best for: Variable cash flow, no ongoing commitment
Quick Comparison
Method
Complexity
Favors Owners?
Testing
Annual Commitment
Pro-Rata
Low
Neutral
General test
As elected
Integrated
Medium
Somewhat
Permitted disparity
As elected
Cross-Tested
High
Significantly
EBAR / Gateway
Must pass testing
Discretionary
Low
Depends
Per method used
None
When Cross-Testing Makes Sense
Cross-tested plans work best when older owners/partners want to maximize their contributions while minimizing cost for younger rank-and-file employees. The age difference allows higher owner contributions to pass the equivalent benefit test. If owner and staff ages are similar, cross-testing provides less advantage.
Glossary
Safe Harbor
Plan design that automatically satisfies ADP/ACP nondiscrimination testing through required employer contributions (match or non-elective).
QACA
Qualified Automatic Contribution Arrangement. Combines auto-enrollment with safe harbor match. Permits 2-year cliff vesting instead of immediate.
ADP/ACP Test
Nondiscrimination tests comparing HCE vs NHCE deferral rates (ADP) and matching contribution rates (ACP). Safe harbor designs bypass these tests.
Permitted Disparity
IRS-approved method allowing higher contributions on compensation above the Social Security wage base, accounting for SS benefits.
Cross-Tested (New Comparability)
Profit sharing method that tests contributions by converting to equivalent benefits. Allows different rates by classification if tests pass.
Pro-Rata
Allocation method giving each participant the same percentage of compensation. Simplest profit sharing approach.
Gateway Minimum
Minimum allocation required for NHCEs in cross-tested plans. Generally 5% of compensation or one-third of the highest HCE rate.
Match Formula
The rate at which employer matching contributions are calculated based on employee deferrals. Expressed as "X% of first Y% of comp."
Profit Sharing
Discretionary employer contributions allocated to participants. Not contingent on actual profits. Separate from matching contributions.
Vesting Schedule
Timeline for participant ownership of employer contributions. Common: immediate, 3-year cliff, 6-year graded. Safe harbor requires immediate vesting (except QACA).
HCE / NHCE
Highly Compensated Employee: >5% owner or prior year comp β₯ $160,000 (2025). NHCE is any participant who is not an HCE.
Top-Heavy Plan
Plan where >60% of account balances belong to key employees. Requires minimum 3% contribution for non-key employees.
Annual Additions (415(c))
Maximum total contributions (employee + employer) per participant. $70,000 for 2025, or 100% of comp if less.
Compensation Limit (401(a)(17))
Maximum compensation considered for plan purposes: $350,000 for 2025. Contributions cannot be calculated on amounts above this cap.
QNEC
Qualified Non-Elective Contribution. Employer contribution that is immediately 100% vested. Can be used to correct ADP/ACP testing failures.
EACA
Eligible Automatic Contribution Arrangement. Auto-enrollment feature allowing employees a 90-day withdrawal window. Not the same as QACA.
Frequently Asked Questions
A safe harbor match requires employee deferrals to trigger the employer contribution β employees who don't defer get nothing. A non-elective contribution gives 3% of compensation to every eligible employee regardless of whether they defer. Non-elective is simpler (no tracking of deferral rates) but costs the same for non-deferring employees. Match designs cost less if some employees don't defer.
Yes β this is very common. The employer match and profit sharing are separate contribution sources. For example, you might offer a safe harbor basic match (4% max) plus a cross-tested profit sharing contribution. Both are included in the annual budget. The 415(c) annual additions limit ($70,000 for 2025) applies to the total of all employer and employee contributions combined.
The budget you set here is the total annual employer cost target β combining match and profit sharing. Design(k) will model the actual contributions per employee and show you the total cost. If it exceeds your budget, come back to Intent(k), adjust your match formula, profit sharing method, or budget amount, and re-send. This iterative loop helps you find the right balance between plan generosity and cost.
You can always come back to Intent(k), change your settings, and re-send. Design(k) will pick up the new configuration. The pipeline is designed for iteration β most plan designs require 2-3 passes to balance goals, contributions, and budget.
No. Safe harbor is optional. Without it, the plan must pass ADP/ACP nondiscrimination testing each year. If the plan fails, HCE deferrals or contributions must be refunded or corrected. Safe harbor eliminates this risk but requires a minimum employer contribution. Use the Custom Formula option if you want a non-safe-harbor match β just know that ADP/ACP testing will apply.
Cross-testing (New Comparability) converts profit sharing contributions into equivalent benefits using age-based actuarial factors. Because older participants have fewer years to retirement, a given dollar amount converts to a larger equivalent benefit. This allows older owners to receive much higher contribution rates than younger staff while still passing IRS tests. It works best when there's a significant age gap between owners and employees. If ages are similar, the advantage shrinks.
The pipeline flows: Census(k) Pro (validate census) β Eligibility(k) (determine who's eligible) β Intent(k) (configure goals, match, PS, budget) β Design(k) (model the plan and test compliance). Intent(k) receives eligible employees from Eligibility(k) via a secure data transfer, and sends the configuration forward to Design(k).
All census data processing happens locally in your browser. The only external call is the AI Configuration Review, which sends only your plan design choices (goals, match type, budget) and aggregate employee count β no names, SSNs, dates of birth, or compensation figures are ever transmitted. Click the Security button in the nav bar for full details.
What's New
v1.0March 2026
β5-Step Configuration Flow: Goals, Employer Match, Profit Sharing, Budget, and Review β full plan intent workflow
βSafe Harbor Match Options: Basic, Enhanced, Non-Elective, QACA, and Custom Formula with editable tiers
βProfit Sharing Methods: Pro-Rata, Integrated (Permitted Disparity), Cross-Tested, and Discretionary
βAI Configuration Review: Claude-powered analysis checks for conflicts and tensions before you send to Design(k)
βPipeline Integration: Receives eligible employees from Eligibility(k), sends configuration to Design(k)
βHelp Center: Built-in documentation with match type comparisons, profit sharing guide, glossary, and FAQ